Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Architecture is an interdisciplinary field of knowledge that can interact with social sciences for its development. Such is the case of the application of knowledge of Philosophy and Anthropology, whose methodological strategies and approaches to the problems perceived in the environment can provide the architect with valuable information for the design of public spaces. The pre- sent work seeks to explore some alternatives and tools available to the designer to obtain relevant information about the interaction between users and the context in which they operate, without resorting to the traditional surveys and interviews used on a daily basis. By means of the insertion of objects with specific characteristics as tools in the space, it is sought to generate interaction between the user and the object, in order to obtain data that allow the designer to generate design proposals according to the real needs of the space. For this, anthropological tools are used, through non-participant observation as a method to better understand the interaction generated between individuals and the inserted object, to later translate the information collected in proposals for socio-spatial modification, which contribute to the improvement of the interactions generated in the space at the collective level. The project shows that it is possible to obtain relevant information from the context without the need to directly address users, depending on the ability of the researcher to transform subjective information into objective data, since the type of information obtained arises in part from unconscious representations, translated into behavioral traits and needs at the collective level, these being the most relevant for the position posed when designing the public spaceReferences
Aguirre, T. (2017). Ciclo largo y sistema financiero: Crisis, contracción del crédito y ganancia. Revista Ola Financiera. Vol. 10 (No. 28). Recuperado de: www.olafinanciera.unam.mx.Abramovitz, M. (1956), “Resource and output Trends in the United States since 1870”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, vol. 46, May.
Arena, R. & Lazaric, N. (2003). La théorie évolutionniste du changement économique de Nelson et Winter. Une analyse économique réprospective, Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 54(2), pages 329-354.
Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-519
Arrow, K. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Review. 84(2): 1-9
Ballesteros, J., Bethencourt, C., Marrero, G., y Perera, F. (2011). Tema 1. Los Modelos de tasa de ahorro exógenas. El modelo de Solow. España, Universidad de la Laguna: Departamento de Análisis Químico. Recuperado: https://campusvirtual.ull.es/ocw/pluginfile.php/2595/mod_resource/content/0/Tema1_Solow_MacroIII_ULL_2011_12.pdf.
Boyer, R. (1985). Marx, la técnica y la dinámica de la acumulación. Cuadernos Políticos, n 43, México.
Cantner, U. (2016). Fundamentos de cambio económico - un enfoque schumpeteriano extendido. J Evol Econ (2016) 26: 701 - 736 DOI: 10.1007/s00191-016-0479-z.
Doimeadiós, Y. (2007), El crecimiento económico en Cuba: Un análisis desde la productividad total de los factores, Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Economía, Universidad de La Habana.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Londres, Pinter Publishers.
Gallego, J. (2003). El cambio tecnológico y la economía neoclásica. Dyna, 70(138), 67-78.
Jiménez-Barrera, Y. (2018). Aproximación crítica a las principales teorías sobre el cambio tecnológico. Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, 193 (49). Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/prode/v49n193/0301-7036-prode-49-193-171.pdf
Katz, C. (1996). La concepción marxista del cambio tecnológico. Revista Buenos Aires. Pensamiento Económico, n 1, pag 155-180, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Consultado: 29-11-2018. Recuperado de: https://katz.lahaine.org/la-concepcion-marxista-del-cambio-tecnologico/
Katz, C. (2014). Discusiones marxistas sobre tecnología. Razón y Revolución, (3).
Kendrick, J. W. (1956), “Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor”, Review of Economies and Statistics, vol. 38.
Kindleberger, C. P. (1989). The German economy, 1945-1947: Charles P. Kindleberger's letters from the field. Meckler.
Kondratieff, N.D. (1926). Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 56; English version: The Long Waves in Economie Life, Review of Economie Statistics,1935, 17, (reprinted in: Lloyds Bank Review, No. 129, July 1978).
Kurzweil, R. (2004). The law of accelerating returns. In Alan Turing: Life and legacy of a great thinker (pp. 381-416). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin.
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
Mandel, E. (1995). Long waves of capitalist development: a Marxist interpretation: based on the Marshall lectures given at the University of Cambridge. Verso.
Marquina, P., Alvarez, C., Guevara, D., & Guevara, R. (2013, 2 de agosto). Revisión de Literatura Esquema. Documento de trabajo con esquema para el desarrollo del Trabajo de Investigación Final-Tesis, modalidad.
Marx, K. (1975). El capital. Libro 1. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
Marx, K. (2013). El capital: tomo I (Vol. 1). e-artnow.
Mazzucato, M. (2013b). Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 851-867.
Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy.
Nelson, R. R., & Sidney, G. (1982). Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change, 929-964.
Orbe, A. (2011). La Singularidad no está cerca, según Paul Allen. Revista hipertextual.
Pasinetti, L. (2000). Critica della teoria neoclassica della crescita e della distribuzione. Moneta e credito, 53(210), 187-232.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research policy, 13(6), 343-373.
Perez, C. (2003). Technological revolutions and financial capital. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No.1, pp. 185-202.
Rincón, E. y Añez, C. (2016). El empresario como agente innovador del desarrollo económico: la visión de Joseph Alois Schumpeter. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia y Tecnología del Instituto Universitario de Tecnología de Maracaibo. Vol. 2 N° 1.
Rosenberg, N. (1980). Marx y la tecnología. Monthly Review, n 8, Barcelona, marzo 1980.
Rosenberg, N., & Nathan, R. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, N. y Frischtak, C.R. (1984)", Technological Innovation and Long Waves", Cambridge Journal of Economics, Nª 8 p.7-24
Rosenberg, N. (2011). Was Schumpeter a marxist? Industrial and corporate change, vol. 20, núm. 4, pp. 1215-1222.
Soete, L., & Turner, R. (1984). Technology diffusion and the rate of technical change. The Economic Journal, 94(375), 612-623.
Solow, R. M. (1957), “Technical Change and The Aggregate Production Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, núm. 3, August.
Solow, R. M. (1962). Technical progress, capital formation, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 76-86.
Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Primera Edición, McGrawHill, New York.
Schumpeter, J. (1967). Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico. Cuarta Edición, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F
Stiglitz, J. (2003). Los felices 90. Buenos Aires: Taurus
Swan, T. W. (1956), “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation”, Economic Record, vol. 32, November.
Tapias, H. (1996). Dinámica tecnológica. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia. Nº 11. Recuperado de: http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/325554/20782926
Tezanos, J.F. (2001). La sociedad dividida. Estructuras de clase y desigualdades en las sociedades tecnológicas. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Tobón, A. (2009). Schumpeter y la nueva síntesis neoclásica en macroeconomía. Perfil de Coyuntura Económica No. 14, pp. 173-188. Universidad de Antioquia. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/pece/n14/n14a7.pdf
Uranga, M. G., Padrón, M. S., & De La Puerta, E. (1992). El cambio tecnológico hacia el nuevo milenio: Debates y nuevas teorías (Vol. 4). Icaria Editorial.
Valenduc, G. (2018) Technological revolutions and societal transitions. ETUI aisbl, Bruselas. Recuperado de: https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Foresight-briefs/Technological-revolutions-and-societal-transitions. Consultado: 28-11-21018
Valenduc, G. y Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the digital economy: sorting the old from the new. European trade union institute. Consultado: 3-12-2018. Recuperado de: http://ftu-namur.org/fichiers/Work_in_the_digital_economy-ETUI2016-3-EN.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.