Keywords
poverty
savings groups
social technology
How to Cite
Abstract
This article presents the evaluation of the Cosecha Colectiva project, which advances rural development in Queretaro by promoting self-managed savings groups. It pursues two objectives: a) to assess the social impact achieved in participating communities, and b) to demonstrate the utility of three formative
evaluation tools (teoría del cambio –theory of change or ToC–, a “small wins” log, and failure reporting) for measuring short-term
impacts in applied research. A mixed-methods design combined document review, semi-structured interviews, participatory
workshops, and situated reflection by the implementation team. The results indicate the consolidation of 19 self-managed groups led predominantly by women, the mobilization of more than four million pesos in internal loans, and the incorporation of the model into educational settings. Evidence of technology
adoption dynamics and external support through funding was also observed. The findings confirm the project’s impact and
demonstrate the feasibility of tracking short-term indicators using the selected tools; accordingly, their integration into public
universities’ evaluation procedures is proposed.
References
Alonso-Yánez, G. y Davidsen, C. (2014). Conservation science policies versus scientific practice: evidence from a Mexican Biosphere Reserve. Human ecology review, 20(2), 3-29.
Arocena, R., Goransson, B. y Sutz, J. (2017). Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems: Alternatives for Knowledge Democratization in the Global South. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B. y Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: evidence from six countries. Science, 348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799
Beyene, N.L., y Dinbabo, M.F. (2019). An empirical evaluation of the link between women participation in Village Savings and Loans Association (VSLA) and poverty reduction in Ethiopia. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 566-580. https://ideas.repec.org/a/lif/jrgelg/v8y2019p566-580.html
Chávez Alcalá, M., Luna Sánchez, E. y Vargas Díaz, A. (2024). Desarrollo de una aplicación móvil para agrupaciones comunitarias de ahorro y préstamo. Transdigital, 5(10), https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital260.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (2022). Medición de la pobreza 2022. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/Pobreza_2022.aspx
De Carvalho, T. y Roelen, K. (2025). Social protection for economic inclusion in Latin America: the potential of comprehensive programming. CSGD Research and Evidence Paper #1. Centre for the Study of Global Development, The Open University. Fundación Capital. https://wels.open.ac.uk/sites/wels.open.ac.uk/files/files/CSGD%20R%26E%20Paper%20%231%20De%20Carvalho%20%26%20Roelen%20%5B11-apr-25%5D.pdf
Duvendack, M. y Mader, P. (2020). Impact of financial inclusion in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of reviews. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 594-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12367
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Making sense of accountability: conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191-212.
Ekboir, J. (2003). Why impact analysis should not be used for research evaluation and what the alternatives are. Agricultural systems, 78(2), 166-184.
Engineers Without Borders. (2017). 2017 Failure report. https://www.ewb.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/EWB_FAILURE-REPORT_EN_03-08-2018-pages.pdf
Eyben, R. (2014). International aid and the making of a better world:reflexive practice. Routledge. Fundación Paraguaya. (2014). Manual del Semáforo de Eliminación de la Pobreza. Fundación Paraguaya. Asunción.
Funnel, S. y Rogers, P. (2011). Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models. Jossey Bass.
Galaz-Fontes, J.F. y Gil-Antón, M. (2013). The impact of merit-pay systems on the work and attitudes of Mexican academics. Higher Education, 66(3), 357-374.
Hall, A., Sulaiman, V., Clark, N. y Yoganand, B. (2003). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural systems, 78(2), 213-241.
Herrera-García, A.F. (2019). Inclusión financiera femenina en México:una herramienta para su empoderamiento. Femeris: Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudios de Género, 4(3), 158-182. https://doi.org/10.20318/femeris.2019.4934
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S. y Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431.
LSE Public Policy Group. (2011). Maximizing the impacts of your research: a handbook for social scientists. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2011/04/14/maximizing-the-impacts-of-yourresearch-a-handbook-for-social-scientists-now-available-todownload-as-a-pdf/
Lybbert, T.J. y Wydick, B. (2018). Poverty, aspirations, and the economics of hope. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66(4), 739-778.
Martín, X. (2014). ¿Qué son los grupos de ahorro? Evolución de los mecanismos grupales de ahorro y crédito. Fondo Multilateral de Inversiones. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://www.findevgateway.org/es/publicacion/2014/07/que-son-los-gruposde-ahorro-evolucion-de-los-mecanismos-grupales-de-ahorro-y
Mora-Rivera, J. y García-Mora, F. (2018). Microfinanzas y pobreza rural en México: un análisis con técnicas de propensity score matching. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 15(82), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.cdr1582.mprm.
Mullainathan, S. y Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: why having too little means so much. Times Books. Nature (2020). Ending hunger: science must stop neglecting smallholder farmers. Nature, 586(7829), 336-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02849-6
Oslo Institute for Research on the Impact of Science (2016). Introduction to the new centre OSIRIS – The OSlo Institute for Research on the Impact of Science. https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/centre/osiris/presentations/presentations-2017/osiris-presentation-general-english.pdf
Reed, M. (2021). The research impact handbook. Fast Track Impact.
Rodríguez-Ferrera, J.C. (2006). Metodologías microfinancieras grupales. Una aplicación de Latinoamérica a Catalunya [Tesis de doctorado]. Universitat Ramon Llull. https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991007268269706719
Roelen, K. (2025). The empathy fix: why poverty persists and how to change it. Allen & Unwin.
Scriven, M. (2005). Review of the book: Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 415-417.
Sivertsen, G. y Meijer, I. (2020). Normal versus extraordinary societal impact: how to understand, evaluate, and improve research activities in their relations to society? Research Evaluation, 29(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz032.
Spaapen, J. y Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
Suárez-Zozaya, M. y Muñoz-García, H. (2004). Ruptura de la institucionalidad universitaria. En I. Ordorika (Coord.), La academia en jaque: perspectivas políticas sobre la evaluación de la educación superior en México (pp. 25-33). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Termeer, C. y Dewulf, A. (2019). A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy and Society, 38(2), 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933
Torcat Rivas, M., Rodríguez-Ferrera, J.-C. y Raydán Rivas, S. (2011). La otra microfinanza. Fundefir.
Vasen, F. y Lujano Vilchis, I. (2017). Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 62(231), 199-228. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S018519182017000300199
Van der Meulen, B., Van Drooge L., Van den Besselaar P., Elsen M., De Haas M., Van den Heuvel J. y Maassen H. (2010). Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: a guide. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:8fa07276-cf52-41f3-aa70-a71678234424.
Weißhuhn, P., Helming, K. y Ferretti, J. (2018). Research impact assessment in agricultura – A review of approaches and impact areas. Research Evaluation, 27(1), 36-42.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Digital ciencia@uaqro