Versiones
- 2024-01-31 (3)
- 2024-01-31 (2)
- 2024-01-29 (1)
Palabras clave
Acuaponía
Agua Limpia y Saneamiento
Sistemas Urbanos de Producción de Alimentos
Suprarreciclaje del Agua
Cómo citar
Resumen
El estado actual de los 9 límites planetarios junto con la tasa de crecimiento de la población mundial nos ha alertado para reconsiderar cómo se utilizan los recursos para satisfacer la demanda de alimentos a través de sistemas agroindustriales sostenibles. Con solo el 0,01% del volumen total del mundo, el agua dulce juega un papel fundamental en la estabilidad y el funcionamiento de cualquier biosistema. El manejo inadecuado que se le ha dado a este recurso sumamente valioso ha provocado que su espacio operativo esté en el umbral de lo seguro y esté a punto de entrar en la zona de incertidumbre. Las acciones presentadas por Naciones Unidas en la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible son una estrategia para reducir y corregir algunos de estos problemas interrelacionados. El objetivo 6 de este documento- Agua Limpia y Saneamiento- busca garantizar la disponibilidad y la gestión sostenible del agua y el saneamiento para todos, sin embargo, este aún no se ha cumplido. Por ello, es fundamental seguir agotando propuestas de posibles soluciones a estos asuntos. La acuaponía, un sistema sostenible de producción de alimentos, se basa en el suprarreciclaje del agua, la reutilización de nutrientes y la reducción de aguas residuales con un sentido orgánico. Por lo anterior, el propósito de este artículo es analizar los beneficios que se pueden obtener del uso de sistemas acuapónicos para acelerar parcialmente el cumplimiento de los objetivos 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 y 6.a en el área de mejorar la calidad del agua reduciendo la contaminación, eliminando los vertidos y minimizando la liberación de productos nocivos, reduciendo a la mitad la proporción de aguas residuales sin tratar y aumentando sustancialmente el reciclaje y la reutilización segura.
Referencias
W. Steffen et al., “Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 33, pp. 8252–8259, 2018.
S. Kumar, N. Kumar, and S. Vivekadhish, “Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Addressing Unfinished Agenda and Strengthening Sustainable Development and Partnership,” Indian J Community Med, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–4, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170955.
M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink, “The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 757–768, Feb. 01, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
K. Raworth, “A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut?” 2012. [Online]. Available: www.oxfam.org/grow
M. Leach, K. Raworth, and J. Rockström, “Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity,” 2013.
J. Rockström, “Planetary boundaries,” Smil, Harvesting the Biosphere, 2010.
United Nations, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” 2015. Accessed: Jun. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: sustainabledevelopment.un.org
L. Wang-Erlandsson et al., “A planetary boundary for green water,” Nat Rev Earth Environ, pp. 1–13, 2022.
D. Dudgeon et al., “Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 81, no. 2. pp. 163–182, May 2006. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950.
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020. doi: 10.4060/ca9692en.
T. Gleeson et al., “The water planetary boundary: interrogation and revision,” One Earth, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 223–234, 2020.
G. J. Gooley, F. M. Gavine, and Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (Australia), Integrated agri-aquaculture systems : a resource handbook for Australian industry development. Rural Industries Research and Development Corp, 2003.
M. M. S. Farrag, M. M. M. Toutou, F. S. Sedik, E. E. D. I. A. Mursy, and A. G. M. Osman, “Towards the Integrated Agri-aquaculture in the Desert Using Groundwater Reservoirs for Nile Tilapia Farming,” Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 215–235, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.21608/EJABF.2021.161839.
P. S. Flores-Aguilar, J. F. García-Trejo, and S. I. Martínez-Guido, “Aquaponic: a Versatile and Integrated alternative in Food Production for the Mexican environment,” Ciencia Autonomous University of Queretaro (UAQ), vol. 13, pp. 43–53, 2020.
C. Jaeger, P. Foucard, A. Tocqueville, S. Nahon, and J. Aubin, “Mass balanced based LCA of a common carp-lettuce aquaponics system,” Aquac Eng, vol. 84, pp. 29–41, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.11.003.
S. Wongkiew, Z. Hu, K. Chandran, J. W. Lee, and S. K. Khanal, “Nitrogen transformations in aquaponic systems: A review,” Aquacultural Engineering, vol. 76. Elsevier B.V., pp. 9–19, Jan. 01, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.01.004.
B. S. Cerozi and K. Fitzsimmons, “Phosphorus dynamics modeling and mass balance in an aquaponics system,” Agric Syst, vol. 153, pp. 94–100, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.020.
H. Monsees, W. Kloas, and S. Wuertz, “Decoupled systems on trial: Eliminating bottlenecks to improve aquaponic processes,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 9, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183056.
W. Kloas, S. Wuertz, and H. Monsees, “Comparisson of coupled and decoupled aquaponics-Implications for future system design,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314305063
H. Monsees, J. Suhl, M. Paul, W. Kloas, D. Dannehl, and S. Würtz, “Lettuce (Lactuca sativa, variety Salanova) production in decoupled aquaponic systems: Same yield and similar quality as in conventional hydroponic systems but drastically reduced greenhouse gas emissions by saving inorganic fertilizer,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 6, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218368.
T. Redek, P. Domadenik, and M. Koman, “Sustainable Development Goals in the EU and the Challenges in Their Implementation,” Challenges on the Path Toward Sustainability in Europe, pp. 11–29, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1108/978-1-80043-972-620201003.
N. Maamoun, “The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success,” J Environ Econ Manage, vol. 95, pp. 227–256, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JEEM.2019.04.001.
N. M.-J. of E. E. and Management 2019, “The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success,” Elsevier, Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069618300391
S. Kumar, N. Kumar, and S. Vivekadhish, “Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Addressing Unfinished Agenda and Strengthening Sustainable Development and Partnership,” Indian J Community Med, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170955.
United Nations, “Sustainable Development Goals; Guidelines for the use of the SDG logo including the colour wheel, and 17 icons,” New York, May 2020.
United Nations, “UN, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” 2021. https://sdgs.un.org/ (accessed Aug. 29, 2021).
“The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022,” The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.4060/CC0461EN.
FAO, “Año Internacional de la Pesca y la Acuicultura Artesanales 2022 Plan de acción Mundial,” 2021.
CONAPESCA, “Anuario Estadístico de Acuacultura y Pesca 2018,” 2018.
SAGARPA, “Criterios Técnicos y Económicos para la Producción Sustentable de Tilapia en México,” 2012.
Fitzsimons, “Tilapia aquaculture in Mexico,” 2000.
Araceli Valdes Zamora, “Análisis y perspectivas de la Acuaponía en México,” Tesis individual, UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO, Chapingo, Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, 2018.
J. Rakocy, “The University of the Virgin Islands Aquaponics System - AquacultureHub,” 2010.
J. Rakocy, D. Bailey, R. Shultz, and J. Danaher, “Preliminary Evaluation of Organic Waste from Two Aquaculture Systems as a Source of Inorganic Nutrients for Hydroponics,” 2007.
W. Kloas et al., “A new concept for aquaponic systems to improve sustainability, increase productivity, and reduce environmental impacts,” Aquac Environ Interact, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 179–192, 2015, doi: 10.3354/aei00146.
H. Palm et al., “Towards commercial aquaponics: a review of systems, designs, scales and nomenclature,” Aquaculture International, vol. 26, no. 3. Springer International Publishing, pp. 813–842, Jun. 01, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10499-018-0249-z.
D. T. Armanda, J. B. Guinée, and A. Tukker, “The second green revolution: Innovative urban agriculture’s contribution to food security and sustainability – A review,” Global Food Security, vol. 22. Elsevier B.V., pp. 13–24, Sep. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.002.
FAO and CGIAR, More people, more food, worse water? a global review of water pollution from agriculture, 978th-92nd-5th-130729th–8th ed. Rome-Colombo: he Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2018 and the International Water Management Institute on behalf of the Water Land and Ecosystems research program of the CGIAR Colombo, 2018, 2018. [Online]. Available: www.fao.org/
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Perspectivas de la Ciencia y la Tecnología