Abstract
Mexican art has always been difficult to conceptualize. From notions that encompass substantial nationalist determination, to discourses that are completely alienated from the country's cultural and social apprehension, Mexican art navigates in a vaporous terrain that is mutable in itself, and that, therefore, is intangible to the touch.
Its gaseous conformation has depended on different perspectives (many of them being foreign), which have structured and modeled it through specific containers. These modulations have led to the naming of Mexican art through compact structures that, while allowing a “relevant” visualization, it enclose it and controls the possibility of its expansion.
The act of naming is an instance of power, and in this sense, Mexican art has not been able to name itself, rather, it has always been named.
That is why post-Mexican art is presented as a possibility of subversion through the apprehension of the symbolism that makes up Mexicanness, and the transgression of said elements in the reconceptualization of a new imaginary, which enables an awareness of being Mexican in postmodern times.
Post-Mexican art encompasses the notion of decolonialism, through a symbolic transculturation through the re-apprehension of the archetypes that made up (and continue to make up) the identity prison of being Mexican, with the possibility of rereading not only the artistic language, but of the very conformation and conceptualization of the national being.
References
Agamben, G. (2018). Signatura rerum: Sobre el método. Adriana Hidalgo.
Cruzvillegas, A. (31 de marzo de 2012). Destrucción total del Museo Nacional De Antropología, un proyecto por Eduardo Abaroa. MA. MESA DE ACCESO.
Debroise, O. y Medina, C. (2006). La era de la Discrepancia. Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Editorial Turner-México.
Diccionario Oxford. (2024). Colonizar. En Diccionario Oxford. Recuperado de https://www.oed.com/dictionary/colonize_v?tl=true
Foucault, M. (1971). El orden del Discurso. Ediciones Tusquets.
Lacan, J. (17 de julio de 1949). Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction du Je, telle qu´elle nous est révélée dans l´expérience psychanalitique [Sesión de conferencia]. XVIvo Congreso internacional de psicoanálisis, Zúrich, Suiza.
López Canaán, M.F. (2023). Prototipo de manifiesto del ser mexicano. Autoedición.
Rascuache Residency. (2016). Rascuachismo. Recuperado el 10 de noviembre de 2023 de https:// www.rasquacheresidency.com/copy-of-contact
Ybarra-Frausto, T. (1989). “Rasquachismo: a Chicano sensibility”. Chicano aesthetics: Rasquachismo. Movimiento Artístico del Rio Salado, Phoenix, AZ.: MARS. Recuperado de https://icaa.mfah.org/s/es/item/845510
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 HArtes